Trust

School Capacity Limits Residential Development Going Forward

As mentioned on our “Accomplishments” Page, school capacity discussions are now built into the process for residential developments. This in of itself has been a huge step forward, as the Town Council now is able to consider real data from the school system and make appropriate decisions based on that; be it a denial, delay to the future to allow capacity to catch up, or a possible conversion to a 55+ or commercial use.

I put this here in my on going platform to stress how vital this topic needs to be now and going forward as Apex continues to consider residential developments. It took a long long time for Apex to build itself into a corner, a problem then made worse by the state’s decision to limit school capacity for elementary schools – the so call “class sized chaos” of 2017 – which, while well intended, had the practical effect of bulldozing an entire elementary school in Apex from a capacity perspective and providing no money for additional teachers or schools needed to handle it.

At the current moment, thanks to the collective efforts of WCPSS and Apex, there are multiple schools either under construction, in design and in the plan, or land banked for the future which together will help address the capacity crisis. But we still need to be diligent and insure that going forward any future residential growth matches up with the WCPSS building plan. And we have to be on the look out for additional curve balls from the state, like a proposal this year to further limit class sizes, and adjust appropriately.

This situation is another motivating factor for my proposal to pivot the land use map towards commercial.

Transparency, Trees

Land Use Map Amendments Must Be Considered Independently

Currently, rezonings which require a land use map amendment are “bundled” together in a single hearing and a single vote. In effect, this precludes an important context free discussion about the best land use from taking place. Instead, requiring separate hearings, separate votes. No rezonings unless it first conforms to the land use map. Land use map amendments can be put forward very early in the process, potentially saving the developer time and money in the event it is turned down.

Read more and join the discussion here.